Napoleon Hill: “The desire for sexual expression is by far the strongest and most impelling of all the human emotions, and for this very reason this desire, when harnessed and transmuted into action, aside from the physical expression, has the potential of lifting men into a higher sphere of thought.”
We have a paradox now.
Where sex is incredibly sacred – consent is extremely important.
At the same time it’s not sacred at all – behaviour such as onlyfans and sleeping with multiple people is considered socially acceptable.
We’re living in a world where birth rates are falling.
Would it be better if contraception didn’t exist?
Impact on Birth Rates
One of the primary justifications for this proposal is the alarming decline in birth rates observed globally. Countries across different continents are facing demographic challenges as birth rates plummet below replacement levels, threatening the future stability of economies and social structures. Proponents argue that contraception, by preventing pregnancy, directly contributes to these declining trends. By banning contraception, they believe it would naturally lead to an increase in birth rates, rejuvenating aging populations and supporting the demographic foundation of societies.
Biological Purpose of Sex
The biological purpose of sex is reproduction. Sex should not be separated from its reproductive function. Contraception disrupts the natural order and purpose of sexual activity by removing the possibility of procreation. This perspective suggests that if people knew sex would likely lead to procreation, they would be more selective and responsible in their sexual behaviors.
Decreased Casual Sex
The anticipation of pregnancy as a possible outcome of sex would deter individuals from engaging in casual or non-committal sexual relationships. Proponents believe that without contraception, people would have fewer sexual partners and engage in sexual activity less frequently outside of committed relationships. This, they argue, could lead to stronger family units and more stable relationships, as the potential for pregnancy would necessitate greater responsibility and commitment between partners.
Sex Transmutation and Societal Ambition
If people weren’t having sex as much, they would become incredibly ambitious.
Another angle to this argument is based on the concept of sex transmutation, popularized by thinkers like Napoleon Hill, who suggested that sexual energy could be redirected towards productive pursuits and personal success. According to this theory, if people abstain from sex due to the unavailability of contraception, this pent-up energy could be transformed into creative and economic outputs. The implication is that society would benefit from a more ambitious, focused, and industrious population, driving innovation and economic growth.
Increased Population Growth
Finally, by removing the means to easily prevent pregnancy, advocates believe that not only would birth rates increase, but societies would adapt by strengthening support systems for families and children, thus fostering a more robust population growth. This growth is seen as essential for maintaining labor forces, supporting elderly populations, and ensuring the cultural and economic vibrancy of future generations.
This would also have negative effects too – many people who are not able to control themselves would have more children.
So this debate might be framed on a societal issue, or an individual issue.
If each person decides to have less sex, transmutes that power into being more ambitious and successful, it can give them an advantage.
Conclusion
This is a deep topic, The purpose of this article is to make you think.
The idea of removing contraception is highly controversial and involves complex ethical, social, and health-related implications. While it is driven by concerns over falling birth rates and societal behaviors, such an approach raises significant questions about personal freedoms, the role of government in reproductive health, and the potential unintended consequences on individual and public welfare. As such, it remains a provocative topic worthy of careful consideration and debate within society.
“The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances: if there is any reaction, both are transformed.” Carl Jung